Talanoa 4: The Cost of Clinging to Individualistic Paradigms: Management and Leadership

By Falahemotu F.N. Makapatama and Makapatama(George)

Kamataaga - Introduction

In Talanoa 3: The Overproduction of Managers and Leaders: A Call for More Servants, we explored the saturation of leadership and management roles and how they have contributed to systems of control, competition and short-termism. We argued that traditional models—deeply rooted in individualistic paradigms—have often prioritised personal authority over collective well-being.

Now, we take this discussion further. What happens when we refuse to let go of these outdated paradigms? What are the real costs of clinging to leadership and management models that center power in individuals rather than communities? More importantly, how can we shift towards a future where servantship becomes the foundation for sustainable change?

Fofola e potu—let’s roll out the mat and talanoa.

For decades, dominant leadership and management models have prioritised efficiency, competition and personal ambition. While this framework has driven technological and economic progress, it has also deepened systemic inequities. The accelerating climate emergency, widening economic disparities and ongoing social fragmentation are not just unintended consequences of progress; they are symptoms of a worldview that separates leadership from service, prioritising short-term gains over long-term well-being.

The urgency to rethink leadership is no longer a philosophical debate—it is a practical necessity. The world is deeply interconnected and interdependent, yet many leadership approaches still operate as if organisations and societies function in isolation. This dissonance has become costly. The alternative? A shift towards servantship—an approach that moves beyond hierarchical power and individual ambition to centre collective responsibility, resilience and sustainability.

The Persistence of Global Challenges

Climate Change: A crisis of short-termism

Despite international agreements and corporate sustainability pledges, greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise. Why? Because traditional management prioritises quarterly profits over long-term planetary health. The incentive structures within leadership encourage incremental environmental action at best, while continuing business-as-usual practices that degrade ecosystems. Servantship, in contrast, fosters stewardship—placing ecological responsibility at the core of decision-making rather than as an afterthought.

Economic Inequality: A symptom of extractive leadership

Wealth is increasingly concentrated in the hands of a few, leaving billions struggling in precarious conditions. Conventional leadership models valorise competition and personal success, often at the expense of equity. Executives earn exponentially more than their workers; corporations exploit resources without regard for local communities. The traditional paradigm rewards those who accumulate power rather than those who uplift others. Servantship flips this dynamic, emphasising shared prosperity over personal gain.

Interconnected Crises: A failure of holistic thinking

Today’s crises are not isolated events—they are deeply interconnected. Economic instability exacerbates social unrest. Climate change fuels displacement and resource conflicts. Public health crises disproportionately impact marginalised communities. Yet, leadership remains fragmented, often treating these issues as distinct challenges rather than components of a larger system. Servantship acknowledges this complexity, advocating for integrated, systemic solutions that address root causes rather than symptoms.

The True Cost of Stagnation

The refusal to shift away from individualistic paradigms is not just ethically questionable—it is pragmatically disastrous. Consider the following consequences:

Environmental Degradation

Our continued reliance on management-driven decision-making accelerates resource depletion and environmental collapse. The consequences of ignoring sustainability are no longer hypothetical—they are devastatingly real, from wildfires in the Global North to rising sea levels threatening island nations. Servantship compels us to act as guardians of the future, embedding ecological responsibility into every level of governance.

Social Disintegration

Societies are unravelling under the weight of inequality. Rising economic disparities fuel resentment and division, leading to political polarisation and unrest. Leadership models that champion individual success over collective welfare fail to foster the social cohesion necessary for stability. Servantship, on the other hand, prioritises community well-being, ensuring that progress benefits the many, not just the few.

Economic Volatility

Short-term financial strategies drive boom-and-bust cycles, leaving entire economies vulnerable to collapse. The 2008 financial crisis was a stark reminder of what happens when leaders prioritise immediate returns over long-term resilience. Servantship urges a different approach—one that aligns economic activity with sustainability and equity, reducing systemic risks in the process.

Erosion of Trust and Legitimacy

People are losing faith in institutions—governments, corporations and even non-profits—because leadership structures consistently fail to deliver meaningful change. This growing distrust weakens democracy, fuels extremism and hampers global cooperation. Servantship rebuilds credibility through transparency, accountability and genuine engagement with communities.

The Urgent Need for Servantship

If traditional leadership and management have proven inadequate, what is the alternative? Fakafekauaga-Servantship provides a framework that directly addresses the shortcomings of current systems by embracing interconnectedness, sustainability, and collective empowerment.

Systemic Solutions

Servantship moves beyond siloed decision-making to recognise the interwoven nature of global challenges. It requires leaders to think beyond their immediate organisational boundaries and consider their impact on society and the planet as a whole. This thinking as a system approach is crucial for addressing today’s complex problems in a meaningful way.

Empowerment and Inclusivity

Where traditional leadership is often hierarchical and exclusionary, servantship is participatory. It empowers communities and stakeholders, ensuring that decisions reflect the voices of those most affected. This inclusivity strengthens social equity and mitigates tensions that arise from exclusionary governance.

Sustainability and Resilience

Rather than prioritising short-term metrics of success, servantship emphasises long-term stability and intergenerational responsibility. Economic policies, business strategies and governance structures that incorporate servantship principles are more likely to withstand crises and adapt to changing global conditions.

Restoring Trust

Transparent, ethical and community-centred leadership fosters trust—an essential yet often overlooked ingredient in functional societies. Servantship not only rebuilds faith in institutions but also encourages active civic participation, reinforcing democracy and social cohesion.

Fakaotiaga - Conclusion

The world stands at a crossroads. The failures of traditional leadership and management are increasingly apparent, yet many continue to cling to outdated paradigms despite their destructive consequences. The cost of inaction is staggering—not just in financial terms but in human lives, environmental degradation and societal unravelling.

Fakafekauaga-Servantship offers a transformative path forward. It is not merely a philosophical alternative but a practical necessity. To build a future that is equitable, resilient and sustainable, leaders must relinquish the illusion of individualism and embrace their role as stewards of the greater good. The time for change is not tomorrow—it is now.

FakaFekauaga Catalyst™ (FFC) – All rights reserved.

All content on this website is the intellectual property of FakaFekauaga Catalyst (FFC) and may not be copied, reproduced, or distributed without permission.